I completely ignored Anthropic’s advice and wrote a more elaborate test prompt based on a use case I’m familiar with and therefore can audit the agent’s code quality. In 2021, I wrote a script to scrape YouTube video metadata from videos on a given channel using YouTube’s Data API, but the API is poorly and counterintuitively documented and my Python scripts aren’t great. I subscribe to the SiIvagunner YouTube account which, as a part of the channel’s gimmick (musical swaps with different melodies than the ones expected), posts hundreds of videos per month with nondescript thumbnails and titles, making it nonobvious which videos are the best other than the view counts. The video metadata could be used to surface good videos I missed, so I had a fun idea to test Opus 4.5:
homebrew-core has one Ruby file per package formula, and every brew update used to clone or fetch the whole repository until it got large enough that GitHub explicitly asked them to stop. Homebrew 4.0 switched to downloading a JSON file over HTTP, because users wanted the current state of a package rather than its commit history. But updating a formula still means opening a pull request against homebrew-core, because git is where the collaboration tooling lives. Instead of using git as a database, what if you used a database as a git?。关于这个话题，heLLoword翻译官方下载提供了深入分析
# allow = ["api.example.com"] # additional domains for agent/allowlist modes。爱思助手下载最新版本对此有专业解读
Beyond this, I think there's a case to be made for designing a new game from the ground up with this architecture. At the very least, gamers who are skeptical about investing their time into a live-service game out of fear of it shutting down could rest easy knowing that the developers have built the game with this failsafe in mind.